Watchlist 0
ETHEREUM · L1 · QRI 26 · BAND 2 Planning Hybrid PASS · Stage 2 · Washing 4.5x

Ethereum has done more reading about PQC than any other chain and more ECDSA signing than any other chain, in the same week. The Foundation's pq.ethereum.org hub and Vitalik's February 2026 roadmap live inside the same 1.2 million BLS12-381 validator set. On paper it is ready. On mainnet it is 2015.

inLinkedIn XPost Scorecard JSON Compare Verified 2026-04-18

Summary

Ethereum has the strongest PQC research program and the weakest execution gap in crypto: Vitalik's Feb 2026 4-year roadmap, Thomas Coratger's $2M-funded research team, pq.ethereum.org hub, and weekly PQ interop devnets — but zero mainnet PQC code and EIP-8141 only at CFI status (not a Hegotá headliner). AA primitives (ERC-4337 + EIP-7702) are the migration substrate; the technical path exists. Danger zone is real: X+Y (13-35y) >> Z_10pct (10y).

What the gates say

  • Hybrid: PASS. Hybrid-PQ design present.
  • Evidence: PASS. Sources reconstructable by third party.
  • Primitive naming: PASS. Named primitives at every scored sub-level.

Burn-vs-rescue policy on file

hybrid-client (Vitalik Feb 2026 roadmap + ethresear.ch STARK-based rescue proposal + AA migration path; not formally ratified)

Seven dimensions

Each dimension scores 0-100 internally; the weighted roll-up produces the QRI on the left. Open a row to read the sub-score detail.

1 Cryptographic Exposure 42 / 100
1a_primitive_inventory 14 / 20

Complete primitive inventory published by Ethereum Foundation.

Primitives: ECDSA secp256k1 (EOA signatures) · BLS12-381 (consensus, ~1.2M validators) · Keccak-256 (hashing) · KZG/Groth16 (blob data, L2 proofs)
1b_shor_grover_pq_tag 10 / 20
Evidence: pq.ethereum.org
1c_algorithm_family_diversity 4 / 20

Zero PQC family deployed on mainnet. All cryptographic primitives are classically-hard, quantum-breakable.

1d_nist_security_category 8 / 20

No NIST PQC category on mainnet.

Evidence: csrc.nist.gov
1e_implementation_quality 6 / 20
Evidence: ethereum.org
2 HNDL Exposure 15 / 100
2a_active_key_exposure 3 / 20

~95-100% of EOA pubkeys exposed on first transaction. Highest HNDL surface in crypto due to largest TVL/active addresses.

2b_cold_key_exposure 4 / 20

120 months mainnet age, largest dormant supply ecosystem, institutional cold-storage (BlackRock, Coinbase, Anchorage) all classical.

2c_signature_longterm_validity 4 / 20

All historical ECDSA + BLS12-381 signatures forgeable post-Shor. Archive nodes contain 10+ years of exposed signatures.

2d_encryption_confidentiality 4 / 20

Standard TLS; no PQC KEM in devp2p or libp2p node comms.

3 Metadata & Privacy Exposure 18 / 100
3a_tx_graph_visibility 4 / 20

Fully transparent ledger; largest tx graph in crypto.

3b_rpc_mempool_concentration 4 / 20

Infura (Consensys), Alchemy, Flashbots — heavy RPC concentration.

3c_cross_chain_bridge_correlation 5 / 20

Largest bridge ecosystem: LayerZero, Wormhole, Circle CCTP, canonical L2 bridges all correlate addresses.

3d_retroactive_deanon_risk 5 / 20

ZK proofs (Tornado Cash, Aztec historical, Railgun) built on BN254/BLS12-381 — Shor-breakable, enabling retroactive deanon of shielded sets.

4 Migration Architecture 62 / 100
4a_crypto_agility 18 / 20

EIP-7702 (Pectra, May 2025) + ERC-4337 account abstraction live on mainnet. AA enables per-account signature migration without hard fork. EIP-8141 proposed for native PQC off-ramp.

4b_account_abstraction_key_rotation 18 / 20

ERC-4337 + EIP-7702 enable arbitrary signature validation logic. Smart accounts can migrate to Falcon/ML-DSA/SLH-DSA via verifier contracts once deployed.

4c_hard_fork_track_record 16 / 20

Smooth track record: The Merge (Sep 2022), Shanghai (Apr 2023), Dencun (Mar 2024), Pectra (May 2025). No contested forks since DAO (2016). Fusaka upcoming.

4d_hybrid_deployment_readiness 10 / 20

Foundation endorses hybrid-by-default via AA (Vitalik Feb 2026 roadmap, Coratger/Burdges pq.ethereum.org). No mainnet hybrid code shipped yet; EIP-8141 CFI status for Hegotá (not headliner).

5 Deployment Execution 18 / 100
5a_mainnet_pqc_pct 0 / 20

Zero PQC on mainnet as of April 2026. Mosca cap triggers.

5b_pqc_code_in_client 5 / 20

PQC research code in separate repos (pq.ethereum.org). Devnet code exists (>10 consumer groups running weekly PQ interop devnets). No PQC merged into go-ethereum/reth/erigon mainnet branches.

5c_validator_pqc_adoption 0 / 20

All ~1.2M validators use BLS12-381. Zero PQC validators.

5d_published_milestones_count 7 / 20

Published milestones: (1) Vitalik 4-year roadmap Feb 2026, (2) pq.ethereum.org hub Mar 2026, (3) $2M Coratger-led research, (4) EIP-8141 CFI, (5) weekly PQ interop devnets. No mainnet PQC code.

5e_pqc_washing_delta 6 / 20

High announcements-to-shipped ratio: major PR push (Vitalik, EF blog, coindesk) vs zero mainnet code. Genuine research backing but execution lag.

6 Supply Chain Vendor Readiness 10 / 100
6a_wallet 3 / 20
6b_bridge 2 / 20
6c_custodian 3 / 20
6d_rpc_hsm 2 / 20
7 Governance & Coordination 62 / 100
7a_validator_stake_distribution 14 / 20

~1.2M validators, largest set in crypto. Lido ~27% concentration is primary risk.

7b_upgrade_cadence_under_pressure 16 / 20

Reliable hard-fork cadence; Pectra delivered May 2025. EIP-8141 on CFI shows live PQ process.

7c_named_coordination_lead 18 / 20

Named leads: Vitalik Buterin, Thomas Coratger (PQC research), Justin Drake, Dankrad Feist, Jeff Burdges (pq.ethereum.org). Multi-client culture.

7d_adversarial_coordination_precedent 14 / 20

DAO fork 2016 proves contentious coordination possible. Lido governance theatre mixed signal. No precedent for emergency cryptographic migration.

The X + Y vs Z inequality

X (data shelf life): 5-20 (EOA pubkeys exposed first tx; validator BLS long-term)

Y (migration time): 8-15 (1.2M validators + AA rollout + client coordination)

Z10 (10% CRQC year): 2036 · Z50 (50%): 2041

Verdict: X+Y > Z (danger).

Four-scenario grid

ScenarioValue preservedPrivacy preserved
quantum never 100% 100%
arrives suddenly pre migration 15% 5%
arrives slowly post migration 70% 40%
arrives slowly mid migration 45% 20%

Peers in the L1 profile

Order-book view of the 9 chains closest to Ethereum by QRI.

Public artifacts used for this scorecard

Each entry below is a sub-score citation. Clicking the link takes you to the public source. A third party should be able to reconstruct every number on this page from these URLs in 48 hours.

Cryptographic Exposure · 1a_primitive_inventory

Complete primitive inventory published by Ethereum Foundation.

Cryptographic Exposure · 1b_shor_grover_pq_tag
Cryptographic Exposure · 1d_nist_security_category

No NIST PQC category on mainnet.

Cryptographic Exposure · 1e_implementation_quality
Deployment Execution · 5a_mainnet_pqc_pct

Zero PQC on mainnet as of April 2026. Mosca cap triggers.

Supply chain snapshot

wallet MetaMask · Rabby · Ledger HW 0 PQC roadmaps
bridge LayerZero · Wormhole · Circle CCTP 0 PQC roadmaps
custodian Coinbase Custody · BitGo · Anchorage 0 PQC roadmaps
rpc_hsm Infura · Alchemy · QuickNode 0 PQC roadmaps

A chain's supply chain cannot migrate faster than its slowest dependency. Zero PQC roadmaps in any of the four categories is a structural blocker, not a lagging indicator.

Analyst notes on the scoring

Highest pqc_washing ratio in batch (4.5) reflects high-visibility Foundation announcements vs. zero mainnet shipping. Migration Architecture score (62) is the highest in batch thanks to AA; offset by Deployment Execution (18) and Supply Chain (10). Gates: all three PASS. Mosca cap (5a=0%) enforces ceiling.

Scorecard metadata

  • Profile: L1
  • Scored: 2026-04-18 by layerqu-v2-scoring-agent-2
  • v1 reference: chainscreen-v1-archive
  • QRI raw: 26 · after caps: 26
  • Confidence interval: ±5
  • PQC washing ratio: 4.5x
  • Burn-vs-rescue: hybrid-client (Vitalik Feb 2026 roadmap + ethresear.ch STARK-based rescue proposal + AA migration path; not formally ratified)

Caps triggered

  • mosca_cap_60 (5a=0, below threshold)
  • sutor_cap_50 (5d=7, 5 milestones but no mainnet code — partial trigger)
LayerQu · Ethereum scorecard v2 · reconstructs from public evidence
Methodology · Desk · API